نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار ، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهراء، تهران، ایران.
2 پژوهشکده محیط زیست، دانشگاه تبریز
3 استادیار، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، پردیس نازلو، ارومیه، ایران.
4 دانشیار، مجتمع دانشگاهی پدافند غیرعامل، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر،تهران ،ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Flood is a natural disaster that once occur, could cause serious financial damage and widespread human losses. Conventional approaches to flood risk management are mostly resistance-based. However, a resilience-based approach, taking into account uncertainties and can play a very effective role in the resilience of human settlements against this critical risk. It is essential to combine these two approaches to manage flood uncertainty through decision-making frameworks, and to use multi-criteria decision tools that can consider perspectives, goals, practical options, and stakeholder evaluation criteria. Accordingly, in focused group discussions, a hybrid set of flood crisis management alternatives were extracted and divided into three stages; pre-crisis, crisis response and post-crisis. The weights of these options were then calculated using a combination of social network analysis approach and multi-criteria decision making, and top three alternatives of each category were presented and examined. The results showed that the resilience-based approach in flood risk management has been considered by experts in cases that indicate the movement of experts from relying solely on a resistance-based approach to an adaptive approach to consider uncertainties, especially the effects of climate change.
کلیدواژهها [English]