1. Bourque, L. B., D. S. Mileti, M. Kano, and M. M. Wood. (2012). Who prepare for terrorism? Environment and Behavior, 44, 374-409.
2. Martin, W.E., Martin, I. M., and Kent, B. (2009). The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: The case of wildfire in high risk communities. Journal of environmental management. 91, 489-498.
3. Lepesteur, M., Wegner, A., Moore, S.A., McComb, A. (2008). Importance of public information and perception for managing recreational activities in thePeel-Harvey estuary. Western Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 87 (3), 389-395.
4. Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S. (2002). Risk area residents' perceptions and adoption ofseismic hazard adjustments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32 (11), 2377-2392.
5. Mulilis, J.P., Duval, T.S. (1995). Negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness:
6. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.
7. Weinstein, N.D. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), 31-50.
9. Cowan, Robert (2005). The Dictionary of Urbanism, Streetwise Press, 331.
10. Brun, W. (1994). Risk Perception: Main Issues, Approaches and Findings. In G. Wright& P. Ayton (Eds.). Subjective Probability, pp. 295-320. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
11. Kaplan, Stanley and Garrick, B. John (1981). On The Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, Vol. 1, Na. 1.
12. Crawford-Brown, D. (1999). Risk-Based Environmental Decisions: Methods and Culture. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Powell D, Leiss W. (1997). Mad Cows and Mothers’ Milk.Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Press, 31-34.
14. Sjöberg, L. and B.-M. Drottz-Sjöberg (1994). Risk perception of nuclearwaste: experts and the public. Center for Risk Research, StockholmSchool of Economics, Rhizikon: Risk Research Report 16.
15. US Environmental Protection Agency (1987). Unfinished business: A comparativeassessment of environmental problems. US EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC.
16. Zhu, D., Xie, X., Gan, Y. (2011). Information source and valence: How information credibilty influences earthquake risk perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 129-136.
17. Pidgeon NF, Hood C, Jones D, Turner BA, Gibson R. (1992). Risk perception. In: Royal Society Group, editors, Risk analysis, perception and management. London: Royal Society, p. 89-134.
18. Wynne B, Waterton C, Grove-White R. (1993). Public perceptions and the nuclear industry in West Cumbria. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
19. Frewer LJ, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis,16: 473-86.
20. Fischoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. (1978). How safe is safe enough: a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9:127-52.
21. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the risks. Environment, 21(3), 14-20, 36-39.
22. Strydom, Piet. (2002). Risk, environment and society: Ongoing debates, current issues and future prospects. Buckingham: Open University Press.
23. Lupton, Deborah (Ed.) (1999). Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.
25.Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural Bias. Occasional Paper no. 35, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland.
26. Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
27.Sjöberg L. (2000). Factors in Risk Perception. Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.1-11.
28. Adams, J. (1995). Risk UCL Press, London.
29.Wilson, C. (1990). Education and risk, in: Hazards and the communication of risk, edited by: Handmer, J. and Penning-Rowsell, E., Gower England.
30.O' Connor, R.E., Board, R.J., Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis 19 (3), 461-471.
31. Setbon, M., Raude, J., Fischler, C, Flauhault, A. (2005). Risk perception of the "Mad Cow Disease" in France: determinants and consequences. Risk Analysis, 25 (4).
32. Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J. R., and van der Veen, A. (2008). Flood riskperceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: An exploratory researchfor hazard mitigation. Nat. Hazards, 46, 307–322.
33. Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I., and Settanni, M. (2008). Disaster preparedness andperception of flood risk: A study in an Alpine valley in Italy, J. Environ. Psychol., 28, 164 –173.
34. Renn, Ortwin., Wachinger, Gisela (2010). Risk Pesrceptin and natural hazards. CapHaz-net, Social Capacity Building for Natural Hazards: Toward More Resiliant Societies.
35. Graves, Kate. L. (2007). Risk Perception of Natural Hazards in the Volcanic Regions of Ecuador and Guatemala. Master of Science in Environmental Policy, Michigan Technologycal Uviversity.
36. Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residentstake precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38,101-120.
37. Peacock, W. G., Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. (2005). Hurricane risk perceptionsamong Florida’s single family homeowners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73,120-135.
38. Whitney, D. J., Lindell, M. K., & Nguyen, H. H. D. (2004). Earthquakebeliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Risk Analysis, 24, 87e102.
39. Cheval, S. (2003). The natural hazard perception. The resuslts of survay did in Romania (October 2001-December2002. Risks and catastroghe. vol. ΙΙ, Casa cartii de Stiinta, Cluj-Napoca, pp. 49-59 (in romanian).
40.McCaffrey, S 2004. Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard. Society & Natural Resources 17, 509-516. McFarlane, B.L, (2005). Public perceptions of risk to forest biodiversity. Risk Analysis. 25 (3), 543-553.
41. Van der Pligt, J. (1996). Perceived risk comparative optimism and behavior. The European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, 91-102.
42.Winter, G., Fried, J.S. (2000). Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland urban interface. Society & Natural Resources 13, 33-49.
43. Kung, Yi-Wen., and Chen, Sue-Huel (2012). Perception of Earthquake risk in Taiwan: Effects of Gender and Past Earthquake Experience. Journal of risk analysis, Volume 32, issue 9, pages 1535-1546.
44. McGee, T.K., McFarlane, B.L, Varghese, J. (2009). An examination of the influence of hazard experience on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Society & Natural Resources 22, 308-323. doi: 10.1080/08941920801910765.
45. Rohrmann, B. (1998). The risk notion: Epistemological and empirical considerations. In M. G. Steward & R. E. Melchers (Eds.), Integrated risk assessment: Applications and regulations (pp. 39-46). Rotterdam: Balkama.
46. Renn, O. & Rohrmann, B. (Eds.) (2000). Cross-cultural risk perception. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers.
47. Rohrmann, B. (1999). Risk perception research: Review and documentation (Studies in Risk Communication 69; also published as WWW version: http://www.kfa-juelich.de/mut/hefte/ heft_69.pdf). Juelich: Research Center Juelich.
48. Mileti, D.S., Sorenson, J.H, (1987). Natural hazards and precautionary behavior. In: Weinstein, N.(Ed.), Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self-protective Behavior. Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-207.
49. Cho, J., Lee, J. (2006). An integrated model of risk and risk-reducing strategies. Journal of Business Research, 59, 112-120.
50. Weinstein, N.D. (1998). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (1), 31-50.
51. Burton, I., Kates, R.W., White, G.F. (1993). The Environment as Hazard, second ed. The Guilford Press, New York/London.
52. Sims, J.H., Baumann, D.D. (1983). Educational programs and human response to natural hazards. Environment and Behavior, 15,165-189.
53. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84 (2), 191-215.
54. Mitchell, AA., Dacin, P.A. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Reserch, 23 (December), 219-239.
55. Lindell, M.K., Prater; C. S. (2002). Risk area residents' perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Journal of Applied social Psychology, 32 (11), 2377-2392.
56. Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), 31-50.
57. Lindell, M.K., Whitney, D. J. (2000). Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Analysis, 20 (1), 13-25.
58. Mulilis, J. P., Lippa, R. (1990). Behavioral change in earthquake preparedness due to negative threat appeals: a test of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20 (8), 619-638.
59. Duval, T.S., Mulilis, J. P. (1999). A person-relative-to-event (PrE) approach to negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 495–516.
60. Mulilis, J.P., Duval, T.S. (1995). Negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a person-relative-to-event (PrE) model of coping with threat. Juurnal of Applied Social Psychology, 25 (15), 1319-1339.
61. Winter, G., Fried, J.S. (2000). Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility and management strategies at the wildland urban inter.
62. Badri, Ali (2008). Perception of Earthquake Risk and Post-disaster Reconstruction: Comparative Study of Two Residential Neighborhoods on Different Socio-economic Status in Tehran. International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC.
63. Lindell, M.K., Perry, R.W. (2000). Household adjustmrnt to earthquake hazard: a review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 32 (4), 461-501.
64. Lindell, M.K., Whitney, D. J. (2000). Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Analysis, 20 (1), 13-25.
65. Dowling, G.R., Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 119-134.
66. Burger J, Palmer M. (1992). Changes in and generalization of unrealistic optimism following experiences with stressful events: Reactions to the 1989 California earthquake. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 18: 39–43.
67. Pedroso de Lima M.L. (1993). Percepcao do Risco Sismico. PhD thesis, Social and
Organizational Psychology, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
68. Helweg-Larsen M. (1999). (The lack of) optimistic bias in response to the Northridge earthquake: The role of personal experience. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21: 119– 129.
69. Shepperd JA, Helweg-Larsen M, Ortega L. (2003). Are comparative risk judgments consistent across time and events? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9): 1169–1180.
70. Spittal M,McClure J, Siegert R, Walkey F. (2005). Optimistic bias in relation to preparedness for earthquakes. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 1: 2005–2011.
71. Schmidt, Markus (2004). Investigating risk perception: a short introduction.
72. Maslow A. (1968).Toward a psychology of being. 3. ed. Van Nostrand Co.
73. Finucane, M. L., & Holup, J. L. (2006). Risk as value: Combining affect and analysis in risk judgements. Journal of Risk Research, 9, 141.
74. French, D. P., Sutton, S., Kinmonth, A. L., & Marteau, T. M. (2006). Assessing perceptions of risks due to multiple hazards. Journal of Risk Research, 9, 657-682.
75. Rohrmann, B. (1994). Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and cross-national comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 150-163.
76. Rohrmann, B. (2003). Perception of risk - Research overview. In J. Gough (Ed.), Sharing the future - Risk communication in practice. Christchurch: CAE, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. [a]
77. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earth scan.
78. Rohrmann, B. (1999). Risk perception research: Review and documentation (Studies in Risk Communication 69; also published as WWW version: http://www.kfa-juelich.de/mut/hefte/heft_69.pdf). Juelich: Research Center Juelich
79. Siegrist, Michael, and Cvetkovich, George (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 5, 713-719.
80. Bord & O’Connor 1992. Determinants of risk perceptions of a hazardous waste site. Risk Analysis, 12, 411-416.
81. Slovic, Poul (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675-682.
82. Jungermann, H., Pfister, H. R., & Fischer, K. (1996). Credibility information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis, 16, 251-261.
83. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., Rorh, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353-362.
84. Siegrist, Michael & Cvetkovich, George (2000). Perception of Hazards: The Role of Trust and Knowledge. Risk Analysis, Vol, 20. No. 5.
85. Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59, 91-99.
86. Paton, D. (2008). Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectiveness. Int. J. Global Environmental Issues, 8/1/2:1-16.
87. http://www.fema.gov/
88. http://earthquakecountry.org/alliance/
90. http://www.shakeout.org/home.html
91. http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/dimrc.html
92. اسماعیلی، مژگان؛ سیف، نسرین؛ سلمانی ندوشن، محمدرضا؛ صحرائی، افتخار؛ جعفری، میترا؛ فکری، سوسن (1390). اقدامات قبل، حین و بعد از بروز بحرانهای طبیعی (زلزله، سیل و طوفان). معاونت بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی تهران، تهران، انتشارات کلام شیدا.
93. Palm, Risa (1998). The impacts of culture on perceived risk and response in the USA and Japan. Elsevier Science. Vlo. 18, No. 1, pp. 35-46.
94. Barron, R.M., Kenny, D.A (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
95. Sobel, M.E (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in Structual equations model. In: Leinhart, S. (Ed.), Socialogical Methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 290-312.
96. http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm
)
