Designing a Model for Effective Crisis Management in the Organization through Organizational Learning (Case Study: Selected Organizations in Isfahan Chamber of Crisis Management)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD. Candidate, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Dept. of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Prof., Dept. of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study is to design a model for effective crisis management in organizations through organizational learning among selected organizations in the Isfahan chamber of crisis management. This study is applied –regarding its purpose, correlative –descriptive – regarding its type, cross- sectional survey- regarding its time of data gathering and it pursues mixed methods (qualitative- quantitative)- regarding the nature of data and research approach. The study’s statistical population in qualitative part includes some organizations in Isfahan chamber of crisis management which were selected by purposive sampling. The statistical population consists of 153 expert people in crisis management were located in the Isfahan chamber of crisis management, who were selected based on snowball technique. In the qualitative part, the interviews were analyzed by thematic method. In the quantitative part, a researcher- made questionnaire was compiled by the results of the qualitative part and this questionnaire was used to collect respondent’s opinions. The content validity was confirmed by subject matter experts' opinions. The questionnaire’s reliability was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.961. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the variables of the crisis phase and post-crisis phases was 0.700 and 0.856, respectively. To analyze the data from the quantitative part, the exploratory factor analysis approach using the principal component analysis (PCA) method has been used.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Kotter, J. P., Akhtar, V., & Gupta, G. (2021). Change: How organizations achieve hard-to-imagine results in uncertain and volatile times: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of management Review, 23(1), 59-76.
  3. Bontis, N. (2001). Organizational Learning: From World-class Theories to Global Best Practices. Management learning, 32(2), 274.
  4. Mitroff, I. I. (2005). Why some companies emerge stronger and better from a crisis: 7 essential lessons for surviving disaster: AMACOM/American Management Association.

5- فرهنگی، علی‌اکبر، پورعزت، علی‌اصغر و عالی‌پور، محمود. (1388). طراحی سیستم فراسازمانی مدیریت ایمنی و پیشگیری از حوادث غیرطبیعی در تهران. دومین همایش جامعه ایمن شهر تهران، ایران، تهران.

  1. Coombs, W. T. (2021). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding: Sage Publications.
  2. Leland, H., & Rubinstein, M. (1988). Comments on the market crash: Six months after. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(3), 45-50.
  3. Antonacopoulou, E. P., Clegg, S., & Cooper, R. (2008). Organisational learning: the dynamic flow of macro and micro forces. The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Behaviour: Volume Two: Macro Approaches, 119-131.
  4. Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploration and exploitation for sustained corporate performance. Organ Sci, 20(4), 685-695.
  5. Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 857.
  6. Argote, L., Beckman, S. L., & Epple, D. (1990). The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management science, 36(2), 140-154.
  7. Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization, and crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 21(1), 231-276.
  8. Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 733-769.
  9. Eismann, K., Posegga, O., & Fischbach, K. (2021). Opening organizational learning in crisis management: On the affordances of social media. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(4), 101692, 1-23.
  10. Vera, D., Crossan, M., & Apaydin, M. (2011). A framework for integrating organizational learning, knowledge, capabilities, and absorptive capacity. Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, 2, 153-180.
  11. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
  1. Werder, K., & Heckmann, C. S. (2019). Ambidexterity in Information systems research: overview of conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 20(1).
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  3. Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research.
  4. Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice: Oxford University Press.
  5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130.
  7. Denzin, N. K. (2001). Interpretive interactionism (Vol. 16): Sage.
  8. Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2013). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises: Routledge.
  9. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  10. Mun, J., Mun, K., & Kim, S.-W. (2015). Exploration of Korean students’ scientific imagination using the scientific imagination inventory. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2091-2112.
  11. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 286.
  12. Zhou, L., Wu, X., Xu, Z., & Fujita, H. (2018). Emergency decision making for natural disasters: An overview. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 27, 567-576.
  13. James, E. H., & Wooten, L. P. (2022). The Prepared Leader: Emerge from Any Crisis More Resilient Than Before: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  14. Simmons, C. (2009). Crisis management & organizational learning: How organizations learn from natural disasters. Available at SSRN 1351069.
  15. Smith, D. (2005). Business (not) as usual: crisis management, service recovery and the vulnerability of organisations. Journal of Services Marketing.
  16. Chekkar‐Mansouri, R., & Onnee, S. (2013). Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the Recurrence of Crises Embracing the Issue of Organizational Learning: An Illustration with the Case of Two Hostile Takeover Bids Faced by S ociété G énérale (1988, 1999). Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 21(1), 56-68.
  17. Liu, L., & Wu, J.-n. (2009). Notice of Retraction: Identifying the Key ways of Organizational Learning for Enhancing Logistic Capability. Paper presented at the 2009 International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce.
  18. Grunnan, T., & Fridheim, H. (2017). Planning and conducting crisis management exercises for decision-making: the do’s and don’ts. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 5(1-4), 79-95.

35- ترکیان، مهدی، دانشفرد، کرم الله، ولی‌خانی، ماشالله و پیله‌وری، نازنین. (1401). طراحی مدل انسجام بین سازمانی در اجرای خط‌مشی‌های مدیریت بحران با رویکرد ساختاری تفسیری. دو فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران، شماره 22، پاییز و زمستان 1401، ص 1-16.

36- افتخاری، سید مصیب، اعتمادی، محسن و حسینی، محمود. (1399). ارائه الگوی مدیریت بحران اجتماعی تحت اثر زلزله و اصلاح ساختار تقسیم‌بندی شریان‌های حیاتی. فصلنامه مدیریت بحران وضعیت‌های اضطراری، دوره 12، شماره 4، ص 7-35.


Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 16 March 2024
  • Receive Date: 07 October 2023
  • Revise Date: 02 January 2024
  • Accept Date: 12 January 2024